![]() Maybe Lightroom does a better job of demosaicing the 24 Mpx files than it does with the 16 Mpx ones. In particular, I only experimented with some recent X-T2 files. ![]() I don't claim to have done anything approaching a rigorous test of the two programs, however, much less an exhaustive one. In the meantime, I've migrated most of my Fuji shooting from an X-T1 to an X-T2, which introduces a new variable. But now that I'm running LR 2015.10, I frankly don't see that much difference in detail between files demosaiced with LR and X-Transformer. I just tried the new public Beta version of X-Transformer and I agree that the introduction of the plug-in capability does indeed improve the compatibility with Lightroom. When I first tried the Iridient X-Transformer product, back in March, I found it interesting but a bit awkward to use. I stopped doing that a while back, partly because I found the workflow tedious and partly because I felt I was finally getting acceptable results with Lightroom alone. There was a time when I was routinely running all my Fuji-X raws through Iridient Developer because I couldn't get the fine detail I thought the files should have been able to deliver with Lightroom. For now the "Adobe Standard" camera profile remains the default. Lightroom also insists on defaulting to its own "Adobe Standard" camera profile regardless of what's embedded in the DNG so use of this profile in Lightroom requires manually selecting it after opening into Lightroom. However, due to inherent differences in the default profile formats used (ICC versus Adobe DCP) the match will not be exact. This "Iridient Standard" camera profile should be a slightly better match to the default camera profile used by Iridient Developer. This option currently is not turned on by default and can be found on the "DNG Options" panel.ģ) The camera's star rating values are now translated into standard XMP metadata fields such that they will be loaded by Lightroom/ACR/Bridge and other programs that support standard star rating metadata.Ĥ) There is now an option to embed an Iridient specific camera profile into the DNG. This feature is specific currently to Lightroom/ACR only and will not translate the film styles over to other RAW processors. To install the plug-in choose "Install Lightroom Plug-in" from the Help menu in Iridient X-Transformer.Ģ) The in-camera Fujifilm film style presets can now automatically be translated into Lightroom adjustment metadata such that the film style chosen in camera is also the initial Camera Profile selected when the DNG is opened into Lightroom/ACR. This plug-in also provides a quick and easy option to launch X-Transformer and bring it to front for settings adjustments prior to processing images. The plug-in requires no additional Preferences setup and avoids some of the limitations and unnecessary intermediate image processing applied by Lightroom when using "Edit In". New feature highlights include:ġ) An all new Lightroom scripting plug-in which for most users will likely be the preferred way of transferring images from Lightroom to X-Transformer and back as quickly and efficiently as possible. This release includes bug fixes, performance improvements and several new features. ![]() (E.g., even though they are demosaiced "linear DNGs," they are still scene-referred.) I think that's what I'm getting with the X-Transformer product, but I need to do more testing.įrom Brian's email on the new version of X-Transformer: The ideal output file from my perspective would be similar to the DNGs that Lightroom's Photo Merge tools emit: for many purposes, including color balance, you can treat them as raw files. ![]() I like the way the Iridient pipeline handles fine detail, but other than that I prefer to use Lightroom's controls. The tricky part of using any third-party raw conversion tool as part of a Lightroom workflow, it seems to me, is deciding how to strike a balance between using the external product's processing capabilities and Lightroom's. But as far as I can determine, after admittedly limited testing, the demosaiced file is basically what you would expect. I've found what I believe to be a minor bug (visually annoying but not functionally pathological) in the entries that are inserted into the develop history by X-Transformer when it is invoked from Lightroom, and reported it today to Brian Griffith, the author of the Iridient software. Isn't this essentially the same as what you need to do whenever you configure any third-party application to work as a Lightroom external editor? It looked that way to me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |